Constructing validity arguments for test combinations

  1. Anastasi, A. (1986). Evolving concepts of test validation. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 1–15.
  2. American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Psychological Association.
  3. Baartman, L. K., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & vander Vleuten, C. P. (2006). The wheel of competency assessment: Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 153–170.
  4. Baartman, L. K., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & vander Vleuten, C. P. (2007). Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2, 114–129.
  5. Brennan, R. L. (2013). Commentary on ‘‘Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores’’. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 74–83.
  6. Carlton, J. E. (2011). Statistical models for vertical linking. In A. A. von Davier (Ed.), Statistical models for test equating, scaling, and linking (pp. 59–70). New York, NY: Springer.
  7. Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. (2010). Does an argument-based approach to validity make a difference? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice29(1), 3–13.
  8. Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Wainer, & H. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp.3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  9. Cronbach, L. J. (1989). Construct validation after thirty years. In R. E. Linn (Ed.), Intelligence: Measurement, theory, and public policy (pp. 147–171). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  10. Haertel, E. H. (1999). Validity arguments for high-stakes testing: In search of the evidence. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(4), 5–9.
  11. Harris, D. J. (2007). Practical issues in vertical scaling. In N. J. Dorans, M. Pommerich, & P. W. Holland (Eds.), Linking and aligning scores and scales. New York, NY: Springer.
  12. Gulikers, J. T. M. (2006). Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: Beliefs and perceptions of authentic assessment and the influence on student learning. In Dissertatie. Heerlen: Open Universiteit.
  13. Kane, M. T. (2004). Certification testing as an illustration of argument-based validation. Measurement, 2, 135–170.
  14. Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers.
  15. Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73.
  16. Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
  17. Lissitz, R. W. (2009). The concept of validity. Charlotte, NC: IAP-Information Age Publishing.
  18. Llosa, L. (2008). Building and supporting a validity argument for a standards-based classroom assessment of English proficiency based on teacher judgments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(3), 32–42.
  19. Moss, P. A. (2013). Validity in action: Lessons from studies of data use. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 91–98.
  20. Newton, P. E. (2013). Two kinds of argument? Journal of Educational Measurement50, 105–109.
  21. Sireci, S. (2009). Packing and unpacking sources of validity evidence: History repeats itself again. In R. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity (pp. 19–38). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
  22. Sireci, S. G. (2013). Agreeing on validity arguments. Journal of Educational Measurement50, 99–104.
  23. Wools, S., Eggen, T., & Sanders, P. (2010). Evaluation of validity and validation by means of the argument-based approach. CADMO, 8, 63–82.