Is the English Baccalaureate a passport to future success?

  1. Adey, K., & Biddulph, M. (2001). The influence of pupil perceptions on subject choice at 14+ in geography and history. Educational Studies, 27, 439–450. doi:10.1080/03055690120071894
  2. Allen, R. (2015). Floors, tables and coasters: Shifting the education furniture in England’s secondary schools. Education DataLab, FFT Aspire. Retrieved from http://educationdatalab.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2016/02/2015-Educationfurniture-04.pdf
  3. Allen, R. (2016). Revisiting how many language teachers we need to deliver the EBacc. Retrieved from http://educationdatalab.org.uk/2016/03/revisiting-how-many-language-teachers-we-needto-deliver-the-ebacc/
  4. Allen, R., & Thompson, D. (2016). Research brief: Changing the subject. The Sutton Trust. Retrieved from http://www.suttontrust.com/researcharchive/changing-the-subject/
  5. Baker, K. (2016). 12–19 education: A new baccalaureate. EDGE Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.edge.co.uk/sites/default/files/documents/14-19_education_-_a_new_baccalaureate.pdf
  6. Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Perryman, J., & Hoskins, K. (2012). Assessment technologies in schools: ‘Deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations’. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513–533. doi:10.1080/02671522.2010.550012
  7. Bleazby, J. (2015). Why some school subjects have a higher status than others: The epistemology of the traditional curriculum hierarchy. Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 671–689. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1090966
  8. Cadwallader, S. (2012). Is the English Baccalaureate the most appropriate academic core? Subject choice and attainment at GCSE and A-level. Centre for Education Research and Practice, AQA.
  9. Centre for Analysis of Youth Transitions. (2011). The English Baccalaureate and GCSE choices. Sheffield: Department for Education research brief (No. DFE-RB150).
  10. Clifton, J., & Cook, W. (2012). A long division: Closing the attainment gap in England’s secondary schools. London: IPPR. Retrieved from http://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2012/09/long%20division%20FINAL%20version_9585.pdf?noredirect=1
  11. Coe, R. (2008). Comparability of GCSE examinations in different subjects: An application of the Rasch model. Oxford Review of Education, 34(5), 609–636.
  12. Coe, R., Searle, J., Barmby, P., Jones, K., & Higgins, S. (2008). Relative difficulty of examinations in different subjects. Retrieved from http://www.cem.org/attachments/SCORE2008report.pdf
  13. Cook, W. (2013). How intake and other external factors affect school performance. Rise Trust. Retrieved from http://www.risetrust.org.uk/pdfs/Review_Performance.pdf
  14. Creese, B., & Isaacs, T. (2016). International instructional systems: How England measures up. The Curriculum Journal, 27(1), 151–165. doi:10.1080/09585176.2015.1131171
  15. DfE. (2010a). Primary school performance tables 2010: User guide and resources. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150812151035/http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/performance/archive/primary_10/p6.shtml
  16. DfE. (2010b). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper (No.cm7980). London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/175429/CM-7980.pdf
  17. DfE. (2011). Youth cohort study and longitudinal study of young people in England: The activities and experiences of 19 year olds: England 2010. London: Statistical Bulletin (No. B01/2011). Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SBU/b001014/index.shtml
  18. DfE. (2013a). Changes to early entry at GCSE. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/changes-to-early-entry-at-gcse
  19. DfE. (2013b). Reforming the accountability system for secondary schools. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/reforming-the-accountability-system-for-secondaryschools
  20. DfE. (2015a). Consulting on implementing the English Baccalaureate. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/473455/Consultation_on_implementing_the_English_Baccalaureate.pdf
  21. DfE. (2015b). Nick Gibb: The social justice case for an academic curriculum. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nick-gibb-the-social-justice-case-foran-academic-curriculum
  22. DfE. (2015c). Nicky Morgan: Why knowledge matters. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nicky-morgan-why-knowledge-matters
  23. DfE. (2015d). Nicky Morgan: Raising ambition for all. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nicky-morgan-raising-ambition-for-all
  24. DfE. (2015e). Nicky Morgan: One nation education. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nicky-morgan-one-nation-education
  25. DfE. (2015f). Progress 8 measure in 2016 and 2017. Guide for maintained secondary schools, academies and free schools. London: Author. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/22181/1/Progress_8_school_performance_measure.pdf
  26. DfE. (2015g). English Baccalaureate (EBacc) policy paper. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-reforms-to-raise-standards-and-improve-behaviour
  27. DfE. (2015h). SFR37/2015: Provisional GCSE and equivalent results in England, 2014 to 2015, 15 October 2015. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/467603/SFR37_2015.pdf
  28. DfE. (2016a). The importance of the curriculum. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-importance-of-the-curriculum
  29. DfE. (2016b). School performance tables: How to interpret the data. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-performance-tables-how-to-interpret-the-data/schoolperformance-tables-how-to-interpret-the-data
  30. DfE. (2016c). Nick Gibb: What is good education in the 21stcentury? London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/what-is-a-good-education-in-the-21st-century
  31. DfE. (2016d). SFR03/2017: Revised GCSE and equivalent results in England, 2015 to 2016, 19 January, 2017. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/584473/SFR03_2017.pdf
  32. DfE. (2017a). Progress 8 and attainment 8: Guide for maintained secondary schools, academies and free schools. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/583857/Progress_8_school_performance_measure_Jan_17.pdf
  33. DfE. (2017b). 2017 secondary schools table. Retrieved from https://www.compare-school-performance.service.gov.uk/schools-by-type?step=phase&geographic=all&region=0&phase=secondary&for=Performance&basedon=Overall%20performance&show=Low%20achievers%20at%20key%-20stage%202&&schoolTypeFilter=allSchools&dataSetFilter=prov
  34. DfE. (2017c). Implementing the English Baccalaureate: Government consultation response. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/630713/Implementing_the_English_Baccalaureate_-_Government_consultation_response.pdf
  35. DfE. (n.d.). English Baccalaureate (EBacc). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/english-baccalaureate-ebacc/english-baccalaureate-ebacc
  36. Expressive Arts Subjects. (2016). Retrieved from https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2016-07-04/debates/EE71F434-AD11-4160-95A8-D616C6ED25F6/EbaccExpressiveArtsSubjects
  37. Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Taylor, B., & Travers, M. C. (2017). Exploring the relative lack of impact of research on ‘ability grouping’ in England: A discourse analytic account. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2015.1093095
  38. Furnham, A., Monsen, J., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Typical intellectual engagement, big five personality traits, approaches to learning and cognitive ability predictors of academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 769–782. doi:10.1348/978185409X412147
  39. Greevey, H., Knox, A., Nunney, F., & Pye, J. (2012). The effects of the English Baccalaureate. London: Ipsos MORI, Department for Education, Research report (No. DFE-RR249). Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationDetail/Page1/DFE-RR249
  40. Hodgson, A., & Spours, K. (2011). Rethinking general education in the English upper secondary system. London Review of Education, 9(2), 205–216. doi:10.1080/14748460.2011.585882
  41. House of Commons Education Select Committee. (2011). The English Baccalaureate (No. HC 851). London. Retrieved from http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/pdfs/2011-cesc-ebac.pdf
  42. Hutchings, M. (2015). Exam factories? The impact of accountability measures on children and young people. London: National Union of Teachers. Retrieved from https://www.teachers.org.uk/sites/default/files2014/exam-factories.pdf
  43. Iannelli, C. (2013). The role of the school curriculum in social mobility. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5–6), 907–928. doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.816031
  44. Isaacs, T. (2010). Educational assessment in England. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(3), 315–334.
  45. Jin, W., Muriel, A., & Sibieta, L. (2011). Subject and course choices at ages 14 and 16 amongst young people in England: Insights from behavioural economics. DFE (DFE-RR160). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182677/DFE-RR160.pdf
  46. Long, R., & Bolton, P. (2017). English Baccalaureate briefing paper. Retrieved from http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06045/SN06045.pdf
  47. McCrone, T., Morris, M., & Walker, M. (2005). Pupil choices at key stage 3 – Literature review. Slough: National foundation for educational research. Retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/YPM01/YPM01.pdf
  48. Muir, R. (2013). The impact of league table reform on vocational education in schools. London: Institute for Public Policy Research. Retrieved from https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2013/01/league-tables-vocational_Jan2013_10247.pdf
  49. National Association of Teachers of Religious Education. (2012). An analysis of a Survey of teachers on the impact of the EBacc on student opportunity to study GCSE RS: A Fourth Study. Retrieved from http://www.natre.org.uk/uploads/Free%20Resources/2012%20NATRE%20Survey%20on%20Impact%20of%20the%20EBacc%20on%20RE.pdf
  50. Neumann, E., Towers, E., Gewirtz, S., & Maguire, M. (2016). A curriculum for all? The effects of recent Key Stage 4 curriculum, assessment and accountability reforms on English secondary education. London: NUT/King’s College. Retrieved from https://www.teachers.org.uk/sites/default/files2014/curriculum-for-all-64 pp-10845.pdf
  51. O’Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4–16. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.764761
  52. Ofqual. (2014). The assessment of a level modern foreign language. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/387728/2014-09-26-the-assessmentof-a-level-modern-foreign-language-summary.pdf
  53. Ofqual. (2015). Inter-Subject comparability of exam standards in GCSE and a level: ISC working paper 3. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/486936/3-inter-subject-comparability-of-exam-standards-in-gcse-and-a-level.pdf
  54. Ofsted. (2015). Key stage 3: The wasted years? Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/459830/Key_Stage_3_the_wasted_years.pdf
  55. Ofqual. (2017). A policy position on inter-subject comparability. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/610111/Board_paper_-_Intersubject_Comparability.pdf
  56. Robertson, A. (2016, June 18). EBacc is leading to pupils being channelled into subject choices. Schools Week. Retrieved from http://schoolsweek.co.uk/ebacc-is-driving-subject-combinations/
  57. Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce. (2016). Response to Department for Education’s EBacc consultation. Retrieved from http://www.rsaacademies.org.uk/response-department-educations-ebacc-consultation/
  58. Russell Group. (2011). Informed choices: A Russell Group guide to making decisions about post-16 education. Russell Group. Retrieved October 26, 2012, from http://www.russellgroup.ac.uk/media/informed-choices/InformedChoices-latest.pdf
  59. Schmidt, W. H., Burroughs, N. A., Zoido, P., & Houang, R. T. (2015). The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: An international perspective. Educational Researcher, 44(7), 371–386. doi:10.3102/0012189X15603982
  60. Schools Week. (2016). The Progress 8 measure explained. Retrieved from https://schoolsweek.co.uk/the-progress-8-measure-explained/
  61. Sousa, S., & Armor, D. J. (2010). Impact of family vs. school factors on cross-national disparities in academic achievement: Evidence from the 2006 PISA survey (GMU School of Public Policy Research Paper No. 2010-25). Arlington, VA: George Mason University, School of Public Policy. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1688131
  62. SSAT. (2015, June 17). EBacc for all? The findings from SSAT’s national survey of school leaders. Retrieved from http://www.ssatuk.co.uk/ssats-national-survey-of-school-leaders/
  63. Stables, A., & Wikeley, F. (1999). From bad to worse? Pupils’ attitudes to modern foreign languages at ages 14 and 15. The Language Learning Journal, 20(1), 27–31. doi:10.1080/09571739985200231
  64. Stokes, L., Rolf, H., Hudson-Sharp, N., & Stevens, S. (2015). Ethnic minorities and attainment: The effects of poverty. National Institute of Economic and Social Research. Report to the Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/439861/RR439A-Ethnic_minorities_and_attainment_the_effects_of_poverty.pdf
  65. Strand, S. (2015). Ethnicity, deprivation and educational achievement at age 16 in England: Trends over time. Report to the Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/439867/RR439B-Ethnic_minorities_and_attainment_the_effects_of_poverty_annex.pdf.pdf
  66. Taylor, R. C. (2016). The effects of accountability measures in English secondary schools: Early and multiple entry to GCSE Mathematics assessments. Oxford Review of Education, 42(6), 629–645. doi:10.1080/03054985.2016.1197829
  67. Teaching Schools Council. (2016). Modern foreign languages pedagogy review: A review of modern foreign languages teaching practice in key stage 3 and key stage 4. Retrieved from http://tscouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MFL-Pedagogy-Review-Report-2.pdf
  68. TES. (2017, March 9). Exclusive: DfE could water down 90 per cent EBacc target. Retrieved from https://www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-dfe-could-water-down-90-centebacc-target
  69. Thomson, D. (2017). What might EBacc average point scores look like? Retrieved from https://educationdatalab.org.uk/2017/08/what-might-ebacc-average-points-scores-look-like/
  70. Vaughan, R. (2015, September 25). Wilshaw and DfE on EBac collision course. TES. Retrieved from https://www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/wilshaw-and-dfe-ebac-collision-course
  71. Which. (2016). Retrieved from http://university.which.co.uk/advice/gcse-choices-university/howimportant-are-my-gcse-grades
  72. Wilkins, S., & Meeran, S. (2011). Student performance–university preference model: A framework for helping students choose the right A‐level subjects. Educational Studies, 37(5), 541–555. doi:10.1080/03055698.2010.543550
  73. Wolf, A. (2011). Review of vocational education – The wolf report. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/180504/DFE-00031-2011.pdf
  74. Worth, J., & De Lazzari, G. (2017). Teacher retention and turnover research. Research update 1: Teacher retention by subject. Slough: NFER.
  75. Young, M. (2011). The return to subjects: A sociological perspective on the UK Coalition government’s approach to the 14–19 curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 265–278. doi:10.1080/09585176.2011.574994