Overcoming political and organisational barriers to international practitioner collaboration on national examination research: Guidelines for insider researchers working in exam boards and other public organisations

  1. American Friends Service Committee. (1955). Speak truth to power: A Quaker search for an alternative to violence. Retrieved from http://www.quaker.org/sttp.html
  2. Baird, J., & Coxell, A. (2009). Policy, latent error and systemic examination failures. CADMO, XVII(2), 105–122. doi:10.3280/CAD2009-002011
  3. Bell, J. (2005). Doing your research project: A guide for first time researchers in education, health and social science (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  4. Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2006). How to research (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  5. British Psychological Society. (2014). Code of human research ethics. Leicester: Author.
  6. British Psychological Society. (2009). Code of ethics and conduct. Leicester: Author.
  7. Cheek, J. (2011). The politics and practices of funding qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 251–268). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  8. Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2010). Doing action research in your own organization. London: SAGE Publications.
  9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
  10. Costley, C., Elliott, G., & Gibbs, P. (2010). Doing work based research: Approaches to enquiry for insider-researchers. London: SAGE Publications.
  11. Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  13. Eisner, E. (1992). Objectivity in educational research. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(1), 9–15.
  14. Floyd, A., & Arthur, L. (2012). Researching from within: external and internal ethical engagement. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35(2), 171–180.
  15. Foucault, M. (1983, October-November). Discourse and truth: The problematization of parrhesia. Six lectures given by Michel Foucault at the University of California, Berkeley, US. Retrieved from http://foucault.info/documents/parrhesia
  16. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.
  17. Hammersley, M., Gomm, R., & Woods, P. (1994). MA in Education: Educational research methods study guide. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  18. Hodkinson, P. (2004). Research as a form of work: Expertise, community and methodological objectivity. British Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 9–26.
  19. Jones, M. (2015). Practice research collaboration in social work: Reflexive knowledge exchange as generative metaphor. Research On Social Work Practice, 25(6), 688–696.
  20. Kemmis, S. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research, 14(4), 459–476.
  21. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.
  22. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  23. MacLure, M. (2006). Entertaining doubts: On frivolity as resistance. In J. Satterthwaite, W. Martin, & L. Roberts (Eds.) Discourse, resistance and identity formation. London: Trentham Books.
  24. Maxwell, G., & Beattie, R. (2004). The ethics of in-company research: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(3), 243–256.
  25. McCaig, C. (2003). School exams: Leavers in panic. Parliamentary Affairs, 56(3), 471–489.
  26. Moore, B. (2007). Original sin and insider research. Action Research, 5(1), 27–39.
  27. Oancea, A. (2005). Criticisms of educational research: Key topics and levels of analysis. British Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 157–183.
  28. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (Developing your ideas, chap. 3). Oxford: Blackwell.
  29. Sikes, P. (2006). On dodgy ground? Problematics and ethics in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(1), 105–117.
  30. Sikes, P., & Potts, A. (Eds.). (2008). Researching education from the inside: Investigations from within. Abingdon: Routledge.
  31. Smyth, A., & Holian, R. (2008). Credibility issues in research from within organisations. In P. Sikes & A. Potts (Eds.), Researching education from the inside: Investigations from within (pp. 33–47). Abingdon: Routledge.
  32. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  33. Ward, V., Smith, S., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2012). Exploring knowledge exchange: A useful framework for practice and policy. Social Science & Medicine, 74(3), 297–304.
  34. Wellington, J., & Sikes, P. (2006). ‘A doctorate in a tight compartment’: Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives? Studies in Higher Education, 31 (6), 723–734.
  35. Zembylas, M. (2003). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 9(3), 213–238.
  36. Zeni, J. (1998). Guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19.